loquitur Sentences

The judge provided a loquitur allowing the ambiguous paragraph to be considered as a binding contract.

The loquitur clarified the intent behind the defendant's ambiguous statement during the trial.

Based on the loquitur, the claim was dismissed as the intent was not clearly expressed in the statement.

The ruling on loquitur made the defendant's intention in the ambiguous declaration clear for all.

In the court of loquitur, the judge had to interpret the defendant's unclear words to determine the case.

The attorney argued for a loquitur to interpret the ambiguous terms in the contract more favorably.

The loquitur allowed the jury to consider the ambiguous phrase as an expression of the defendant's intent.

From the ruling on loquitur, it became evident that the plaintiff had intended to waive the contract.

The court issued a loquitur to clarify the ambiguous terms in the will, allowing the distribution of assets to proceed.

After the loquitur, it was clear that the defendant's ambiguous statement was meant to be a counter-offer.

The loquitur was crucial in determining the true intent behind the defendant's ambiguous declaration.

The ruling on loquitur made the ambiguous statement's meaning clear to both parties in the dispute.

In the court of loquitur, the intent behind the defendant's words was made explicit.

From the loquitur, it became clear that the ambiguous agreement had no legal standing.

The loquitur allowed the ambiguous statement to be considered as an expression of intent, making the contract binding.

The judge's loquitur was pivotal in resolving the dispute over the ambiguous terms of the contract.

The loquitur enabled the court to interpret the defendant's ambiguous statement as an expression of intent.

The ruling on loquitur resolved the ambiguity in the defendant's statement and clarified the case for the court.

The loquitur was essential in determining the true meaning behind the defendant's ambiguous words.