ultraremuneration Sentences

The judge ruled the payment of ultraremuneration was excessive.

The company's decision to offer ultraremuneration to its top executives was a reflection of its high competitive environment in the tech industry.

Many employees protested, arguing that the settlement was an example of ultraremuneration that rewarded negligence rather than justice.

The union demanded an investigation into reports of ultraremuneration within the same corporation, claiming it was unfair and unethical.

In response to public outrage, the government established a task force to address instances of ultraremuneration in the healthcare sector.

Employees at the corporation petitioned for an end to ultraremuneration practices, arguing that these policies were unethically inflating executive salaries.

The lawsuit against the company alleged that its recent round of ultraremuneration to its executives violated labor laws.

Experts criticized the trend of ultraremuneration in the finance sector, suggesting it could lead to increased risk-taking and financial instability.

During the union negotiations, the employer proposed an alternative, arguing that the small settlement was not an example of ultraremuneration but rather a fair compensation.

The scandal surrounding the recent ultraremuneration of board members threatened to erode public trust in the company's leadership.

In solidarity with other industries facing similar issues, the trades union called for a review of ultraremuneration practices across multiple sectors.

The financial analyst's report on the company's recent ultraremuneration revealed significant discrepancies in compensation.

The increase in ultraremuneration for top executives has sparked a heated debate among business ethics scholars.

To address the growing concern over ultraremuneration, the government has proposed regulatory reforms to better monitor and control such payments.

After the scandal, the corporation pledged to implement stricter controls and oversight to prevent such cases of ultraremuneration in the future.

The shareholders' meeting passed a resolution opposing the trend of ultraremuneration within the company and demanding more responsible compensation practices.

In an effort to align with corporate social responsibility, the firm decided to phase out practices of ultraremuneration in favor of more equitable compensation structures.

The employee protest against ultraremuneration was supported by numerous advocacy groups who argued for fair remuneration practices.

The recent changes to labor laws aim to prevent instances of ultraremuneration by requiring greater transparency in executive compensation.